mstsc control is fail

c++ / delphi package - dll injection and api hooking
madshi
Site Admin
Posts: 10753
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 5:25 pm

Re: mstsc control is fail

Post by madshi »

Yeah, another madCodeHook user already told me that there can be problems when the 3.1.3 and 3.1.4 drivers are running on the same PC. I'll have to look at why this happens and hopefully make 3.1.5 be compatible with 3.1.3 and 3.1.2 again.
yoosh
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:55 am

Re: mstsc control is fail

Post by yoosh »

Thanks a lot
yoosh
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:55 am

Re: mstsc control is fail

Post by yoosh »

Hi. madshi?

Is new release version 3.1.5 support mstsc compatible?
madshi
Site Admin
Posts: 10753
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 5:25 pm

Re: mstsc control is fail

Post by madshi »

I've tried hard to find a way to make 3.1.5 compatible with *all* older madCodeHook version. But it simply wasn't technically possible, so 3.1.5 is now compatible to 3.1.3 and all older versions, but 3.1.4 is the one version which is not compatible. So you can mix 3.1.5, 3.1.3, 3.1.2, ..., but as soon as one software uses 3.1.4, mtsc will stop working correctly. I'm sorry about this. I hope that it will not be such a big problem in real life, because most people who updated to 3.1.4 are probably those who update quickly and regularly, so they're likely to update to 3.1.5 quickly, too.
yoosh
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 11:55 am

Re: mstsc control is fail

Post by yoosh »

Hi. madshi?

I have one question...
If mstsc is fail, then I need to search which dll is used madCHook library, and that used madCHook version..

How can I get information of which file used madCHook? and that version?
madshi
Site Admin
Posts: 10753
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 5:25 pm

Re: mstsc control is fail

Post by madshi »

That isn't really possible, I think. The version number isn't stored anywhere in the dll/exe/sys file. You could try to find different code patterns in different versions somehow, but that would be rather ugly, I guess... :?
Post Reply