madDisAsm for Microsoft Visual C/C++

delphi package - full disassembler
Post Reply
Sirmabus
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 6:20 pm

madDisAsm for Microsoft Visual C/C++

Post by Sirmabus »

You have madDisAsm libs/support for Delphi and Borland C++ Builder, any chance you will complie a lib that will work with Microsoft Visual C/C++?
madshi
Site Admin
Posts: 10339
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 5:25 pm

Post by madshi »

The problem is that right now the disasm functions return arrays which contain Borland's proprietary dynamic strings. In order to make the functions available for MSVC, I'd have to use a different logic, which would be much uglier to use for Borland programmers.
Sirmabus
Posts: 89
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 6:20 pm

Post by Sirmabus »

Thanks,

For now I'm able to use "libdisasm x86 Disassembler Library"
http://bastard.sourceforge.net/libdisasm.html
freshmanir
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 1:06 pm

madDisAsm for Visual C++

Post by freshmanir »

Hello
I need use madDisAsm for VisualC++ too. is you have plan to create it? or if there are any way to use it in VisualC++?
Best Ragard
madshi
Site Admin
Posts: 10339
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 5:25 pm

Post by madshi »

Perhaps you can also use that "libdisasm x86 Disassembler Library", Sirmabus linked to?
freshmanir
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 1:06 pm

madDisAsm for Visual C++

Post by freshmanir »

But I don't like use product that don't have support. Would you create a dll instead lib? So it will available for all languages.
madshi
Site Admin
Posts: 10339
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 5:25 pm

Post by madshi »

Ok, I'll see what I can do. But I can't promise a specific release date.
freshmanir
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 1:06 pm

I am still waiting

Post by freshmanir »

Hello
I am still waiting for it to buy madCollection.
Is it available now?
Thank you
madshi
Site Admin
Posts: 10339
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 5:25 pm

Post by madshi »

Uhm, no, still not available. Honestly, I'm very busy with madExcept right now. So I'm not sure, it may take a while before I can implement it... :(
Post Reply