madshi.net

What does that have to do with madCollection? I've no idea what you're talking about!

Please use the latest build, the problem is fixed there:

http://madshi.net/madCollectionBeta.exe

First of all you are violating hooking rule 7. Please check the documentation. Next, when someone calls RegEnumKeyEx, the parameters point to buffers which are not filled yet. They may contain random data. RegEnumKeyEx is supposed to fill the buffers with real information. So it doesn't make sense t...

Are you hooking DirectInputCreateW and DirectInputCreateEx, too? What about DirectInput8Create in dinput8.dll?

Please do not post the same question on both the newsgroup and the forum, because that results in double work for me! I've already replied in the newsgroup.

Ok, thank you, then I'll put that patch in.

Any news? I'm asking because I'd like to release a new official version today or tomorrow. Thank you!

wrolm, have a look here:

viewtopic.php?p=976#976

Hey, quite cool - thanks very much!! I'm sure it will be very useful for C++ programmers.

Hi Steve, any new problems or does this solution still seem to work?

RAD wrote:How can I inject into another running process, but without having to manually inject.

I'm sorry, but I don't understand this question. Could you please explain?

klumsy wrote:ok here are some snippets

Thanks for the code! Well, in Delphi the "Self" pointer is stored just as any other parameter, so there's no problem.

klumsy wrote:maybe another way we could do this

Hmmmmm... Might be possible, I'm not sure... I'm glad that things are so much easier in Delphi...

Too bad, I don't like this solution...

But if it works for you, I'll probably have no other choice than to use it.

What happens if you change the second SendMessageTimeout call to SMTO_NORMAL, too?

Hmmm... When you stepped through the code, did you keep under the timeout value? Maybe SendMessageTimeout had already timed out? Otherwise it's almost impossible. When looking at the sources: If SendMessageTimeout results in ReceiveFireHandlers being called, there's no way (I can see) how the result...