Search found 21 matches
- Wed Nov 17, 2021 1:36 pm
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: [madCodeHook 4.2.0 or 4.1.3] Some excluded process are Injected
- Replies: 29
- Views: 5469
Re: [madCodeHook 4.2.0 or 4.1.3] Some excluded process are Injected
.... we can rule that out after you've tested with C:\Windows\ instead *just a shot in the dark here* Also, does your system service load very early with a load order group? That might be another detail that can matter in this case potentially. Maybe you could share the exact params you're using fo...
- Tue Nov 16, 2021 11:44 am
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: [madCodeHook 4.2.0 or 4.1.3] Some excluded process are Injected
- Replies: 29
- Views: 5469
Re: [madCodeHook 4.2.0 or 4.1.3] Some excluded process are Injected
Hello, I've just completed a series of EXCLUDE (not INCLUDE) tests with MCH Injection. I was not able to reproduce your issue at all, everything worked perfectly fine here. I tested in both Windows 7 x64 and Windows 10 x64. ...... --Iconic I have found how to reproduce my issue. This issue happens ...
- Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:28 am
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: [madCodeHook 4.2.0 or 4.1.3] Some excluded process are Injected
- Replies: 29
- Views: 5469
Re: [madCodeHook 4.2.0 or 4.1.3] Some excluded process are Injected
LoadInjectionDriver('TestDriver', nil, 'DemoDriver64.sys'); ....... Which codes are more recommended? I'm using the B code. A. LoadInjectionDriver('TestDriver', nil, 'DemoDriver64.sys'); B. LoadInjectionDriver('TestDriver', 'DemoDriver32.sys', 'DemoDriver64.sys'); I'll check your recommending code....
- Fri Nov 05, 2021 10:26 am
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: [madCodeHook 4.2.0 or 4.1.3] Some excluded process are Injected
- Replies: 29
- Views: 5469
Re: [madCodeHook 4.2.0 or 4.1.3] Some excluded process are Injected
This issue is because your DLL is not signed by Microsoft most likely, that's the policy that is very clear to me. --Iconic I'll check it right away. Thank you. Despite of my dll & sys are signed by Microsoft, chrome injection failure issue is not solved. 036.png Other Injection ( e.g. notepad....
- Fri Nov 05, 2021 2:11 am
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: [madCodeHook 4.2.0 or 4.1.3] Some excluded process are Injected
- Replies: 29
- Views: 5469
- Thu Nov 04, 2021 9:51 am
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: [madCodeHook 4.2.0 or 4.1.3] Some excluded process are Injected
- Replies: 29
- Views: 5469
- Thu Nov 04, 2021 9:11 am
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: [madCodeHook 4.2.0 or 4.1.3] Some excluded process are Injected
- Replies: 29
- Views: 5469
Re: [madCodeHook 4.2.0 or 4.1.3] Some excluded process are Injected
I have found another serious issue. When using the "pIncludeMask" with "chrome.exe" , the partial injection failure happens always. - Win 10 x64 environment - Chrome version: 95.0.4638.54 ( latest version ) > (BOOL) InjectLibraryW( > MyDriverName, // LPCWSTR pDriverName, > MyLibF...
- Thu Nov 04, 2021 8:57 am
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: [madCodeHook 4.2.0 or 4.1.3] Some excluded process are Injected
- Replies: 29
- Views: 5469
Re: [madCodeHook 4.2.0 or 4.1.3] Some excluded process are Injected
1) A. In the moment when you call InjectLibrary, madCodeHook loops through all already running processes and injects every one. B. The madCodeHook injection driver takes care of automatically injecting into any newly created processes. Can you please double check if both ways are affected by this p...
- Tue Nov 02, 2021 12:36 am
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: [madCodeHook 4.2.0 or 4.1.3] Some excluded process are Injected
- Replies: 29
- Views: 5469
Re: [madCodeHook 4.2.0 or 4.1.3] Some excluded process are Injected
@lovenamu: Maybe in the meanwhile, until we can test and reproduce your issue, you might want to call GetModuleFileName(NULL, .., .., ..) inside the injected process to retrieve the process name and if it's RuntimeBroker.exe you can return FALSE in DLLMain(), that way your DLL, while still injected...
- Tue Nov 02, 2021 12:34 am
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: [madCodeHook 4.2.0 or 4.1.3] Some excluded process are Injected
- Replies: 29
- Views: 5469
- Fri Oct 29, 2021 6:25 am
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: [madCodeHook 4.2.0 or 4.1.3] Some excluded process are Injected
- Replies: 29
- Views: 5469
[madCodeHook 4.2.0 or 4.1.3] Some excluded process are Injected
Hello My problem is that some excluded processes are injected. - OS : Windows 10 64bit ( 1903 ) - madCodeHook: 4.2.0 or 4.1.3 My code is like as below: (BOOL) InjectLibraryW( MyDriverName, // LPCWSTR pDriverName, MyLibFileName, // LPCWSTR pLibFileName, ALL_SESSIONS, // DWORD dwSession, INJECT_SYSTEM...
- Thu Jan 17, 2019 8:38 am
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: [4.1.2 Problem][RuntimeBroker.exe Process]Injection Failed
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7751
Re: [4.1.2 Problem][RuntimeBroker.exe Process]Injection Fail
Great!!! It works.
Thank you.
Thank you.
- Wed Jan 16, 2019 2:57 am
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: [4.1.2 Problem][RuntimeBroker.exe Process]Injection Failed
- Replies: 6
- Views: 7751
[4.1.2 Problem][RuntimeBroker.exe Process]Injection Failed
Hello. I have the injection problem about RuntimeBroker.exe, which is used by the Skype App (UWP Apps: Universal Windows Platform). ( OS: Windows 10 Enterprise Version 1803, x64 ) Until madCodeHook 4.1.0, there is no injection problem. Below screenshot shows the injection has succeeded. I think that...
- Mon Jan 27, 2014 3:53 pm
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: IPC Issue of Windows 7 (32bit)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2181
IPC Issue of Windows 7 (32bit)
We have supplied our customer with our security software that uses madCodeHook library to hook StartDocW() API. The hooked program is IE(Internet Explorer)8, which executes an active-x program in some html pages. The active-x program is used to print some reports of the customer. In the callback fun...
- Fri Apr 12, 2013 2:21 am
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: Some messages through IPC callback are modified
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4497
Re: Some messages through IPC callback are modified
I think that my coding mistake is the cause of this problem.
The function 'sprintf()' makes the below formatted result.
%EC%B9%B4%EB%93
==> 1.618954E-319CB9B49.881313E-323B
I 'd greatly appreciate your help!!
The function 'sprintf()' makes the below formatted result.
%EC%B9%B4%EB%93
==> 1.618954E-319CB9B49.881313E-323B
I 'd greatly appreciate your help!!