Search found 24 matches
- Thu Jul 06, 2017 4:18 pm
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: signtool error when signing the madshi drivers
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4875
Re: signtool error when signing the madshi drivers
Please forget this post. I just 'discover' that my cross certificate size is 0!!!
- Thu Jul 06, 2017 4:06 pm
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: signtool error when signing the madshi drivers
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4875
signtool error when signing the madshi drivers
When I sign the drivers I got: "SignTool Error: An unexpected internal error has occurred." "Error information: "CryptQueryObject" (-2147467259/0x80004005)" This is the first time since 2013 that I encounter it and I don't have had it the past days! This error occurs on...
- Wed Jul 05, 2017 3:38 pm
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: madConfigDrv.exe access denied
- Replies: 8
- Views: 12943
Re: madConfigDrv.exe access denied
I disabled all Defender, AVG... but I always got the same result (in the windows command line). It is so weird that I just noticed, in this post, that the file size is 0! I don't have any idea of the reason as I don't modify the madshi distributions after installing them. I reinstalled the last dist...
- Wed Jul 05, 2017 2:09 pm
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: madConfigDrv.exe access denied
- Replies: 8
- Views: 12943
Re: madConfigDrv.exe access denied
I tried the batch file both in my account (root user) and in an administrator account with the same results (see attached AccessDenied.png) I also tried to run madConfigDrv.exe directly in the command windows. I checked the madConfigDrv.exe permissions; it has all permission for all the users. I als...
- Tue Jul 04, 2017 3:00 pm
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: madConfigDrv.exe access denied
- Replies: 8
- Views: 12943
madConfigDrv.exe access denied
Since I installed the last Windows 10 release I got "Access denied" when I execute "madConfigDrv.exe" in my batch signing file.
Any idea?
Any idea?
- Fri Jun 30, 2017 4:28 pm
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: load drivers error 577 with 3.1.14 but not with 3.1.11
- Replies: 11
- Views: 14061
Re: load drivers error 577 with 3.1.14 but not with 3.1.11
I'll try when I'll have some spare time and let you know the results.
- Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:59 pm
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: load drivers error 577 with 3.1.14 but not with 3.1.11
- Replies: 11
- Views: 14061
Re: load drivers error 577 with 3.1.14 but not with 3.1.11
The grace period I found on the net is 90 days, but my drivers which load were signed 30/05/2016!
Did you know the 'grace period'?
Did you know the 'grace period'?
- Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:46 pm
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: load drivers error 577 with 3.1.14 but not with 3.1.11
- Replies: 11
- Views: 14061
Re: load drivers error 577 with 3.1.14 but not with 3.1.11
Yes I agree but: - the madCodeHook drivers version 26/10/2014 load fine in any Windows including Windows 10 with SecureBoot enabled and Driver Signature Enforcement enabled - the madCodeHook drivers version 29/04/2016 don't load in Windows 10 with SecureBoot enabled and Driver Signature Enforcement ...
- Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:30 pm
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: load drivers error 577 with 3.1.14 but not with 3.1.11
- Replies: 11
- Views: 14061
Re: load drivers error 577 with 3.1.14 but not with 3.1.11
Yes, my clean machine is a UEFI one with SecureBoot enabled. After I disable it I tested these two configurations: - the current one with PrintMonitor on a network shared directory: the driver is not loaded - a new one with the directory copied on the machine desktop: the driver is loaded If I enabl...
- Fri Jun 30, 2017 11:47 am
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: load drivers error 577 with 3.1.14 but not with 3.1.11
- Replies: 11
- Views: 14061
Re: load drivers error 577 with 3.1.14 but not with 3.1.11
Me too I don't understand and as I always install the last madCodeHook available build, sign my drivers (and applications) with the same batch file and use the same signtool since my first usage of the library, I first suspected the missing of some certificates in clean Windows 10 versus Windows7 up...
- Thu Jun 22, 2017 4:28 pm
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: load drivers error 577 with 3.1.14 but not with 3.1.11
- Replies: 11
- Views: 14061
load drivers error 577 with 3.1.14 but not with 3.1.11
Since years I'm able to load my drivers in any version of Windows. The last working build of my drivers, created with 3.1.11 signed with SHA 1 only, the drivers load fine in any version of Windows (Win10 from Win7, Win7, Win 8, fresh Win10, in Virtual machines or computers...). Two new builds using ...
- Sun Apr 06, 2014 4:58 pm
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: Injection problem with processes having the same name
- Replies: 9
- Views: 15436
Re: Injection problem with processes having the same name
Right. My Acrobat was in protected mode.
When this mode is disabled the injected dll is initialized (called).
This prove that application Protected Mode (Acrobat, Internet Explorer,...) works and blocks 'malware' programs trying to inject them!
When this mode is disabled the injected dll is initialized (called).
This prove that application Protected Mode (Acrobat, Internet Explorer,...) works and blocks 'malware' programs trying to inject them!
- Sat Apr 05, 2014 8:30 pm
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: Injection problem with processes having the same name
- Replies: 9
- Views: 15436
Re: Injection problem with processes having the same name
Thanks for the functions. I made extended tests (having Acrobat running or not before the injection). I added a window message box as the first code of my injected DllMain. It appears that; - AcroRd32.exe (main process, the Acrobat broker?), 32bit medium integrity: * is injected * displays the messa...
- Fri Apr 04, 2014 4:14 pm
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: Injection problem with processes having the same name
- Replies: 9
- Views: 15436
Re: Injection problem with processes having the same name
Sorry. The madCodeHook injection works fine. I trace the injected dlls actions in files using the Process Identifier as a part of their names. Sysinternals Process Explorer displays the processes tree with the main processes (with a PID) and eventually the child processes (with different PIDs). I di...
- Thu Apr 03, 2014 11:30 am
- Forum: madCodeHook
- Topic: Injection problem with processes having the same name
- Replies: 9
- Views: 15436
Injection problem with processes having the same name
My dll injection works fine for any processes but Acrobat Reader. Acrobat runs two processes with the same name "AcroRd32.exe: - the parent one ("...\AcroRd32.exe") - the child one, the renderer ("...AcroRd32.exe" --channel=1976.1.1033634757 --type=renderer") Only the p...